MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1549102773 · doi:10.1111/chd.12283

Understanding Age-based Transition Needs: Perspectives from Adolescents and Adults with Congenital Heart Disease

2015· article· en· W1549102773 on OpenAlexaff
Keila N. Lopez, Melissa Karlsten, Francesca Bonaduce de Nigris, Jason E. King, Katherine B. Salciccioli, Alice Jiang, Ariane Marelli, Adrienne H. Kovacs, Michael Fordis

Bibliographic record

VenueCongenital Heart Disease · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineYoung adultMentorshipHeart diseaseQualitative researchGerontologyMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the transition process in congenital heart disease (CHD) care through the perceived needs and concerns of adolescents (pretransition) and the experiential insight from adults (post-transition), in order to inform future transition initiatives and information delivery methods. DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, adolescents and adults with moderate or complex CHD participated in semistructured telephone interviews. Interview transcripts were coded using NVivo qualitative data software. SETTING: Single large urban tertiary care CHD center PATIENTS: Adolescents (between 16 and 20 years of age) and adults (21-40 years of age) with moderate or complex CHD. Patients with global developmental delay or known chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. Twenty adolescents and 20 adults participated in the study; each interview allowed for participants to discuss issues relevant to them. RESULTS: Among adolescents, half wanted more CHD information and half were concerned about becoming adults with CHD. All adolescents had access to the Internet via a mobile phone, but only 55% had searched online for CHD information. Adolescents were interested in mentorship with other adolescents (90%) and adults (60%) with CHD either in person or via protected social media. Among adults, 55% were satisfied with the amount of information they had received as adolescents. Areas in which adults would have preferred additional information include longer-term implications of CHD, employment, insurance, family planning, and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: There are similarities and differences in the perceived transition needs of a diverse group of adolescents and adults with CHD. Both cohorts desire additional information during the transition process, including interest in use of a transition checklist to learn about managing their CHD. Adolescents are interested in interactions with other teens and adult mentors with CHD and are open to Internet-based interventions. Web-based initiatives could deliver CHD information and provide a platform for social media mentorship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCongenital Heart DiseaseSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207