Changes in fetal cardiac axis between 8 and 15 weeks' gestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To document changes in the normal embryonic/fetal cardiac axis in the late first and early second trimesters of pregnancy. METHODS: Images from 188 fetal echocardiograms performed prospectively between 8 and 15 weeks' gestation in 166 healthy pregnancies and in 10 pregnancies with severe fetal heart disease were reviewed. For each echocardiogram, three measurements of the cardiac axis were taken in the axial plane at the level of the four-chamber view. Differences in mean embryonic/fetal cardiac axis at different gestational ages in the healthy pregnancies were compared. RESULTS: The mean ± SD embryonic/fetal cardiac axis was 25.5 ± 11.5° from 8 + 0 to 9 + 6 weeks (Group 1), 40.4 ± 9.2° from 10 + 0 to 11 + 6 weeks (Group 2), 49.2 ± 7.4° from 12 + 0 to 12 + 6 weeks (Group 3), 50.6 ± 5.7° from 13 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks (Group 4) and 48.6 ± 7.3° from 14 + 0 to 14 + 6 weeks (Group 5). Groups 1 and 2 were significantly different from each other and all other groups (P < 0.05). The results for 22 cases with repeat measurements from 8 + 0 to 11 + 6 and 12 + 0 to 14 + 6 weeks confirmed that the embryonic/fetal cardiac axis increased significantly (P < 0.001). In the cases with severe congenital heart disease, the cardiac axis was > 90th centile in four cases and < 10th centile in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: The embryonic cardiac axis is relatively midline at 8 weeks and levorotates in the late first trimester. By 12 weeks' gestation, the normal leftward fetal cardiac axis is established and remains stable until at least 14 + 6 weeks. Observation of an abnormal cardiac axis in some cases of severe congenital heart disease prior to 15 weeks' gestation may assist in prenatal detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".