Techno-imaginaires du corps à l’ère des technosciences. Art contemporain et utopie de la transformation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le récit, l’oeuvre d’art, la performance participent de la « mise en culture » des technosciences en en fournissant des clés de lecture, de réflexion, de provocation. La caractéristique de la technoscience est surtout la création d’un « techno-imaginaire » qui, de manière très significative, semble se développer autour du corps comme lieu d’exercice, d’expérimentation, de mutation du vivant et de l’organique et aussi comme lieu de construction d’une identité aux possibilités inédites. L’article se propose d’analyser la relation entre certaines tendances de l’art contemporain et les utopies du corps qui sont à la base des pratiques de l’amélioration humaine, des perspectives transhumanistes, de l’idéologie des technologies convergentes. Entre fascination du corps en devenir et visions « subversives » de la modification proposées par certains artistes contemporains, les possibilités de « créer une nouvelle vision morale » du posthumanisme restent entièrement ouvertes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it