MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1549628968

"Dave, come on": Indigenous Identities and Language Play in Yves Sioui Durand’s Hamlet-le-Malécite

2010· article· en· W1549628968 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michèle Lacombe

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHAMLET (protein complex)IndigenousForegroundingPoliticsAlienPower (physics)IronyArtSociologyLiteratureHumanitiesHistoryAestheticsLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hamlet-le-Malecite, written by the Huron-Wendat playwright Yves Sioui Durand in collaboration with Jean-Frederic Messier, is a re-imagined version of Shakespeare’s Hamlet featuring First Nations characters.  Primarily interested in foregrounding power relations rather than illustrating “universal” themes, the play dramatizes the process of decolonization, including the necessity of breaking silences and confronting past and current injustices, through a hybrid approach that incorporates parody and irony.  Sioui Durand employs multiple languages and code switching as a way to challenge assumptions about contemporary Aboriginal people.  What results is a complicated dance between a Western theatrical world, in which Hamlet’s relevance to contemporary Indigenous politics is evident, and an Indigenous theatrical world, in which its relevance to contemporary Indigenous art forms is challenged as much as it is affirmed.  Hamlet-le-Malecite simultaneously appropriates, parodies, and sets aside Shakespeare in a new form of Native literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207