A evolução do Programa de Subvenção do Prêmio do Seguro Rural: uma avaliação do período 2006-10
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The paper aims to investigate the Brazilian Rural Insurance Program performance from 2006 to 2010. A review of the literature was performed on the operational basic underpins of the insurance industry with focus on rural insurance. It was developed also a synthesis of the international experiences on international rural insurance: United States, Canada, and the European Union; following that the Brazilian agricultural policy with regard to rural insurance was studied. The data was based on the Rural Insurance Census produced by MAPA – Agriculture, Livestock and Supply Office in order to assess the performance of the rural insurance program. The analysis pointed out that the Brazilian rural insurance program, despite its stabilization effect over rural incomes, still has small impact on the entire Brazilian crops production. Also, federal budget funds available must be improved in order to increase the percentage of insured crop areas. Finally, it was perceived the necessity to expand the program targeted to small and mid size producers. Key words: rural insurance; income insurance; agriculture policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.079 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it