MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1549918996 · doi:10.4000/ries.930

La réforme de la formation à l’enseignement au Québec

2010· article· fr· W1549918996 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yves Lenoir

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale d éducation de Sèvres · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article porte un regard critique et sociohistorique sur la récente réforme de la formation initiale des enseignants québecois. Il présente d’abord le contexte sociopolitique et les origines de la réforme du système scolaire au cours des années 1960. Suit un aperçu de la structure du système scolaire au Québec. Une attention particulière est portée au fonctionnement général des commissions scolaires. Puis sont successivement abordées les deux dernières réformes de la formation initiale des enseignants, celle de 1994 et celle de 2001, avec leurs deux principales orientations : la professionnalisation du corps enseignant et le recours à l’approche par compétences. Les transformations en profondeur de la formation initiale des enseignants, qui sont l’objet de plusieurs enjeux et d’influences diverses, sont lourdes de conséquences dont il faudra évaluer les aspects positifs comme négatifs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale d éducation de SèvresSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207