Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article porte un regard critique et sociohistorique sur la récente réforme de la formation initiale des enseignants québecois. Il présente d’abord le contexte sociopolitique et les origines de la réforme du système scolaire au cours des années 1960. Suit un aperçu de la structure du système scolaire au Québec. Une attention particulière est portée au fonctionnement général des commissions scolaires. Puis sont successivement abordées les deux dernières réformes de la formation initiale des enseignants, celle de 1994 et celle de 2001, avec leurs deux principales orientations : la professionnalisation du corps enseignant et le recours à l’approche par compétences. Les transformations en profondeur de la formation initiale des enseignants, qui sont l’objet de plusieurs enjeux et d’influences diverses, sont lourdes de conséquences dont il faudra évaluer les aspects positifs comme négatifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".