MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1549985535 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n14p1

Land-Property Complex of Saint-Petersburg and Its Development in Present Situation

2015· article· en· W1549985535 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sergey Maksimov, Natalia Vasileva, Irina A. Bachurinskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSaint Petersburg State University
KeywordsSaint petersburgProperty (philosophy)Land useDevelopment (topology)GeographyRegional scienceEnvironmental planningCivil engineeringRussian federationEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today state and development of land-property complex of Saint-Petersburg that is number 2 city of Russia andone of the greatest cities of the Europe has been reviewed in the article. Trends and problems of development ofland-property complex of Saint-Petersburg have been revealed, measures to increase efficiency of its utilizationin today situation have been defined. Definition of the concept of land-property complex has been providedtogether with data on land structure of Saint-Petersburg and its dynamics in last decade. Changes in landproperty forms, volume and structure of nonresidential property by building types have been shown.Disproportions in spatial and territorial structure of the city, problems of effective use of city land and otherrealty and differences in land tenure and development compared with global trends have been revealed as a resultof analysis. High priority activities necessary to increase efficiency of land-property utilization have beendefined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social Science→Same topicUrbanization and City Planning→French-language works237,207→