MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1550113574

Analysis of China’s Employment in Cities and Towns

2014· article· en· W1550113574 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lin Yuan, Ke Shang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor market dynamics and wage inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaUnemploymentEconomicsTertiary sector of the economyService (business)Labour economicsUnemployment rateLabor relationsLabor demandSupply and demandState (computer science)Rural areaBusinessEconomic growthEconomyPolitical scienceMacroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the reform in transitional economies, the status of labor market in China has changed a lot, and unemployment problem is becoming increasingly acute in cities and towns. By calculating the labor force participation rate and analyzing the migration of rural labor into cities and towns, this paper studies the unemployment problem in cities and towns from the aspect of labor supply. From the aspect of labor demand, regression analysis is made to reveal the affecting relations between employment and economic growth. Based on the above analysis, this paper reveals reasons for china’s employment problem in cities and towns and gives some policy advices, such as deepening reform in the state-owned enterprises and the adjustment of economy structure to keep a certain economic increasing rate, enforcing the macro-control of the employment, developing enterprises with medium or small sizes and the tertiary industry, and setting up service system in labor market to promote employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityFrench-language works237,207