MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1550299878 · doi:10.21874/rsp.v48i2.384

Contratos de gestão: instrumentos de ligação entre os setores do aparelho do Estado

2014· article· pt· W1550299878 on OpenAlex
Marcelo de Matos Ramos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista do Serviço Público · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic-Private Partnership Projects
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo visa desenvolver algumas questões sobre os contratos de gestão, e sobre o movimento pela “contratualização” tanto nas relações entre o Estado e o setor privado, quanto nas relações intra-estatais. A “contratualização” é então abordada desde duas tradições: uma é a tradição advinda da administração pública, que enfatiza aspectos relacionados à identidade, socialização, sistema de crenças e capacitação da burocracia pública; a outra corresponde à tradição disciplinar da economia, mais preocupada com os aspectos microeconômicos relativos à estrutura de incentivos com que se deparam os atores em uma organização burocrática. A experiência nacional e internacional em “contratualização” é brevemente analisada, e concluímos propondo algumas recomendações e indicando novos rumos de pesquisa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it