MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1550394408 · doi:10.7202/1030039ar

Diagnostiquer la « schizophrénie spirituelle » du Canada français1 : la politique spirituelle de Claude Ryan, 1952-1958

2015· article· fr· W1550394408 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michael Gauvreau, Jean‐Philippe Warren

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire de l Amérique française · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse le rôle intellectuel de Claude Ryan dans une transformation culturelle de grande envergure au sein de l’Action catholique au Québec de 1945 à 1958. Durant ces années, la pensée de Ryan fut fortement influencée par de nouveaux courants de théologie catholique et la psychologie sociale dominant l’horizon de nombreux intellectuels américains. Sous son inspiration, l’Action catholique abandonne progressivement sa préoccupation initiale avec la réforme sociale, dominée par la « question des travailleurs » et la notion de la jeunesse comme classe à part dans la société moderne, pour une inquiétude centrée sur la classe moyenne québécoise, une orientation plus psychologique, centrée sur l’existence des mentalités religieuses et culturelles conflictuelles. Dès le milieu des années 1950, Ryan décerna dans ce conflit un vecteur dynamique de la sécularisation, mais il demeura plutôt optimiste que ces contemporains trouveraient, par le biais d’un catholicisme plus centré sur le spirituel, les ressources culturelles pour surmonter ce qu’il identifiait comme la « crise de l’adolescence » du Canada français.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire de l Amérique françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207