Intraarticular glucocorticosteroid injection into the lateral atlantoaxial joint under fluoroscopic control. A retrospective comparative study in patients with mechanical and inflammatory disorders.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall efficacy in various disorders of glucocorticoid injection into the lateral atlantoaxial joints, performed via the posterior route under fluoroscopic control. METHODS: Retrospective study of 26 patients including 16 (19 injections) with mechanical disorders and ten (16 injections) with inflammatory disorders. RESULTS: The response rate was 69.3%, the mean pain scale score decrease was 52.3 +/- 40.1%, and the mean duration of pain relief was 8.1 +/- 11.8 months. All three parameters were significantly (P < 0.005) better in the subgroup with inflammatory disorders than in the subgroup with mechanical disorders (response rate, 100% vs 50%; pain scale score decrease, 80 +/- 27% vs 34.2 +/- 40%, and pain relief duration, 16.9 +/- 14.9 months vs 24.5 months). A single patient developed a side effect (moderately severe hypertension). CONCLUSION: Glucocorticoid injection into the lateral atlantoaxial joints is a valid treatment alternative in patients who fail to respond to conventional noninvasive therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".