Measurement of vibrations and radiated acoustic noise of electrical machines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The investigations reported in this paper mainly concern the vibration and noise aspects of polyphase induction motors. Although the investigations are focused on induction machines, the fundamental results presented in the paper will be applicable to other types of rotating electrical machines. The maximum allowable noise levels associated with the operation of electrical machines of different sizes and speeds are stipulated in the various standards. Although these noise levels represent the upper limits, they do not necessarily reflect upon the achievable levels with the present state of art in the design of electrical machines. Considering the physiological characteristics of the human ear, magnetic noise of electrical machines is particularly troublesome since it is characterised by many pure tones. The conventional methods for the measurement of resonant frequencies, vibrations and noise are laborious and very time consuming. This paper presents the laboratory-techniques which have been developed for the measurement of resonant frequencies, vibrations and noise based on digital processing of signals. The measurement set-up acquires and processes signals from several transducers with the help of a data-acquisition system and a personal-computer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it