MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1550880920 · doi:10.1002/lsm.22320

Cryolipolysis for safe and effective inner thigh fat reduction

2015· article· en· W1550880920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLasers in Surgery and Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersValeant Pharmaceuticals International
KeywordsMedicineAnterior compartment of thighThighAdverse effectSurgeryBody contouringReduction (mathematics)UltrasoundMassagePatient satisfactionAbdomenButtocksLiposuctionNuclear medicineWeight lossRadiologyObesityInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While cryolipolysis initially received FDA clearance for fat reduction in the abdomen and flanks, there was significant interest in non-surgical fat reduction for other sites, such as the inner and outer thighs. This article reports the results of an inner thigh study which contributed to FDA clearance of cryolipolysis for treatment of thighs. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIAL AND METHODS: A flat cup vacuum applicator (CoolFit applicator, CoolSculpting System) was used to treat 45 subjects bilaterally in the inner thighs. Single cycle treatments were delivered at Cooling Intensity Factor (CIF) 41.6 for 60 minutes followed by 2 minutes of manual massage. Follow-up visits were conducted at 8 and 16 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by ultrasound imaging, circumference measurements, and photographs. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by questionnaire. RESULTS: Data is presented for n = 42 patients that completed the 16 week study follow-up and maintained their weight within 5 lbs. of baseline. Independent photo review from three blinded physicians found 91% correct identification of baseline clinical photographs. Ultrasound data indicate fat layer reduction of 2.8 mm. Circumferential measurements indicate mean reduction of 0.9 cm. Patient questionnaires reveal 93% were satisfied with the CoolSculpting procedure; 84% noticed visible fat reduction; 89% would recommend to a friend; and 91% were likely to have a second treatment. There were no device- or procedure-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The CoolFit flat cup vacuum applicator was found to deliver safe and effective cryolipolysis treatment to reduce inner thigh fat. Completed 16-week data from 42 subjects show 2.8 mm reduction in fat thickness and 0.9 cm reduction in circumference. Assessment of clinical photographs found 91% correct identification of baseline images. The results of this prospective, multi-center, interventional clinical study contributed to FDA clearance of cryolipolysis for treatment of thighs in April 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it