MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551255917

Kurdish Identity, Discourse, and New Media (review)

2012· article· en· W1551255917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Middle East Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyCritical discourse analysisDiscourse analysisSociocultural evolutionMedia studiesNational identityJargonIdentity (music)IdeologyPublic spherePoliticsGender studiesPolitical scienceLinguisticsLawAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KURDS Kurdish Identity, Discourse, and New Media, by Jaffer Sheyholislami. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 252 pages. $85. The new communication media (satellite television and the internet specifically) have increasingly affected global political and economic dynamics from democratization to terrorism and from economic development to conflict resolution. Jaffer Sheyholislami - born Kurdistan-Iran and currently an assistant professor at the School of Linguistics and Language Studies at Carleton University Canada - examines the ways Kurds have been using satellite television and the internet to construct their multiple as well as pan-Kurdish identity. To order and inform his data and findings, the author uses the interdisciplinary approach of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), framework for studying media discourse [that] consists of three interrelated dimensions: text, discourse practices, and sociocultural (pp. 14-15). CDA is useful combining theories of and national identities, discourse and media, the three main areas with which this study is concerned (p. 41), and is a research approach aimed at making transparent the discourses and ideology of the powerful order to create discourse awareness among the oppressed (p. 184). Following his jargon-laden and overly technical introduction, the author devotes his second chapter to theory and method to illustrate how national are discursive constructs, examine the significance of communication technologies construction, and explore sociocultural contexts that bear upon media products. Further chapters focus on the Kurdish identity, Kurdish media from to Facebook, discourse practices and textual analysis of the Barzani-led Kurdistan Democratic Party's (KDP) satellite television channel KTV, and discourse practices and textual analysis of the Kurdish internet. In contrast to his initial introductory chapter, the author now begins to turn apt phrases and make insightful observations. For example, although one must be wary of technological determinism (p. 37), one might still see as the child of print (p. 31). It is safe to suggest that the press shaped the ideas and politics of the intellectuals and activists, who are the architect of nationalism (p. 83). At the same time, however, the author also examines why none of the traditional news media were capable of creating truly imagined pan-Kurdish community. He submits, however, that since the mid-1990s, satellite television and the Internet have facilitated dialogic communication among the Kurds, development that possibly has contributed to the emergence of strong and unprecedented cross-border collective Kurdish identity (p. 79). The author notes that although in the late 1700s, the printing press contributed to the formation of the modern nation-states; today, the electronic media are used by minorities and nations without state of their own their projects of building communities and collective identities (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it