MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551388113 · doi:10.1109/med.2015.7158778

Cooperative Unmanned Aerial Vehicles formation via decentralized LBMPC

2015· article· en· W1551388113 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlocking (texture)Robustness (evolution)TrajectoryComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Convergence (economics)Decentralised systemControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a team of cooperative Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) maintains a desired geometrical formation while tracking a reference trajectory using a new control approach. Decentralized Learning Based Model Predictive Control (DLBMPC) is a new control technique that combines statistical learning along with control engineering while providing guarantees on safety, robustness and convergence. The ability of the proposed DLBMPC controller in solving the problem of formation for a team of cooperative UAVs is solved in simulation. The designed controller respects the general formation constraints known as Reynolds rules of flocking. Our main contribution in this paper lays in the stabilization of a group of cooperative UAVs, in a desired formation, while tracking a reference trajectory using DLBMPC in the presence of model uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207