MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551491875 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2015.7129170

A DLL fractional M/N frequency synthesizer

2015· article· en· W1551491875 on OpenAlexaff
Haizheng Guo, T. Kwaśniewski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJitterDirect digital synthesizerFrequency synthesizerPhase-locked loopFrequency multiplierComputer scienceElectronic engineeringDelta-sigma modulationDelay-locked loopLoop (graph theory)Frequency modulationBandwidth (computing)MathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design limitations of a DLL-based fractional-N frequency synthesis are reviewed in this paper. A novel dual-loop delay-locked loop (DLL) fractional-N frequency synthesizer is presented. The proposed DLL architecture overcomes the integer-N limitation of the conventional DLL-based frequency multiplier, and achieves small frequency spacing while maintaining low jitter accumulation. A DLL-based digital-to-phase converter with a phase interpolator is employed as the first loop to provide modulated fractional reference clock and precise lower frequency injection signal. The fine phase/frequency spacing is achieved by applying delta-sigma modulation at the DLL digital-to-phase converter. Another MDLL is used as the second loop to suppress spurs in the modulated fractional reference signal and achieving high frequency output. To verify the proposed architecture, a system-level DLL model is built and simulate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207