MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1551659937 · doi:10.1002/9781119970446.ch18

The Market View

2011· other· en· W1551659937 on OpenAlexaff
Abd‐Elhamid M. Taha, Hossam S. Hassanein, Najah Abu Ali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemtocellTelecommunicationsComputer scienceWirelessRelayMobile telephonyCellular networkWireless networkComputer networkBusinessMobile radio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter overviews the market status and outlook for IMT-Advanced technologies. It discusses the status of the mobile and wireless market today, in terms of both networks and handsets, and considering other relevant aspects. The chapter draws on the possible evolution tracks that is taken by operators in getting to 4G networks. It is organized in two parts. The first part discusses the recent and the near future efforts in the market as they move towards deploying IMT-Advanced networks. It elaborates on the pre-IMT-Advanced activity, and the possible evolution tracks that operators might take towards next genet generation networks. The second part builds on the market description and describes the outlook for IMT-Advanced markets. It also describes the interplay and the effect of spectrum deregulation, the proliferation of “small cells”, including relay stations, femtocells and WiFi Spread. Finally, it concludes with a brief comment on the road ahead. Controlled Vocabulary Terms 3G mobile communication; 4G mobile communication; femtocells; IEEE 802.11 standards

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.015
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→