Des effets pervers des politiques d’égalité. L’exemple de la Suisse et du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’analyse comparative de l’évolution des économies domestiques en Suisse et au Québec bouscule les a priori concernant le caractère favorable aux femmes des politiques d’égalité des sexes. Sur le marché du travail, les politiques mises en place au Québec favorisent l’accès des femmes à des salaires plus égalitaires. Cependant au sein des familles, leur influence sur les règles de répartition des dépenses et des revenus peut conduire ces femmes à être dans des situations économiques plus défavorables que les Suissesses qui pourtant vivent dans un État moins propice à l’égalité. Si les politiques égalitaires sont bénéfiques pour les femmes adoptant le modèle masculin du citoyen individualiste et producteur qu’elles soutiennent implicitement, elles semblent pénaliser celles qui font un autre choix de vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".