[The Boulduc dynasty, apothecaries in Paris in XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Parisian Boulduc family had four apothecaries among its members from the XVIIth to the XVIIIth centuries : Pierre, Simon, Gilles-François and Jean-François. Two of them were members of the Académie royale des sciences but all held important offices in the Parisian apothecary Community or in the Royal apothecaries Society. One of Pierre's five sons, Simon, was a member of the Académie royale des sciences, one other, Louis, went to Canada and became King of France Public Prosecutor at the Québec Provostship. He got married there and his eight children were probably at the foundation of the Bolduc dynasty (they modified their name) living in Québec. Victim of intrigues and accused of embezzlements Louis came back to France where he died. Simon's son, Gilles-François, was like his father a member of the Académie royale des sciences and his own son Jean-François was the King's first apothecary. Simon Boulduc's main scientific work is presented in this first article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".