Bibliographic record
Abstract
On or about 6th January 2010, under the guidance and co-ordination of OPUS, Listening Posts aimed at providing a snapshot of the societal dynamics of each country at the dawn of 2010 were held in twenty-six different countries around the world (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, South Africa [two Reports], Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK). These were all reported in a similar format (see ‘Britain and the World at the Dawn of 2003’ in Organisational & Social Dynamics, 3(1): 165-169), researched and analysed by the authors, to produce this Global Report. The authors self-defined their task as follows. To research and analyse the National Reports with a view to: (a) identifying common themes arising within the twenty eight Reports; (b) exploring relationships between themes and to reduce these down to major or dominant themes; (c) collating supporting information from the Reports for analysis of these themes; (d) formulating hypotheses arising therefrom. For the sake of brevity this Report will only document the major interrelated themes identified, followed by an analysis and hypotheses regarding each.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".