MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551857356 · doi:10.1300/j015v25n01_01

Gone But Not Forgotten

2002· article· en· W1551857356 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Kranz, Judith C. Daniluk

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen & Therapy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosenessConstruct (python library)PsychologyQualitative researchDevelopmental psychologyPsychology of selfInterpretative phenomenological analysisQualitative analysisPeriod (music)Social psychologySociologyAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A qualitative, phenomenological approach was taken to explore how women in midlife experience and meaningfully construct the recent death of their mothers. During in-depth interviews, 9 women between the ages of 42 and 65 reflected on the loss of their mothers within the previous 2 to 5 year period. Despite differences in the perceived closeness of their relationships with their mothers, the data analysis yielded seven common themes in the experiences of the participants as they attempted to live with, and make sense of, what each perceived to be a very significant loss in her life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.014
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen & TherapySame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207