MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552055758 · doi:10.5772/27744

A Pathophysiological Approach to Understanding Pulmonary Hypertension in Cardiac Surgery

2012· book-chapter· en· W1552055758 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, Alain Deschamps, France Varin, P. Louis, Y. Andr

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathophysiologyMedicinePulmonary hypertensionCardiac surgeryIntensive care medicineCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and is an important prognostic factor in cardiac surgery. As the average age and associated comorbidities of cardiac surgical patients increase, the prevalence of PH is likely to rise. In this chapter, we will define PH, classify it on the basis of pathophysiological etiology, and suggest treatment therapies according to this classification. The importance of PH in cardiac surgery, its relationship to right ventricular dysfunction and preventive therapies will also be discussed. When applicable, we will draw from our clinical experience with PH to suggest strategies for the prevention of possible complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207