MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cotidiano das alunas pioneiras da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto: 1953-1957

2014· dissertation· pt· W1552148905 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tatiana de Oliveira Sousa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrejudice (legal term)Content analysisSociologyPedagogyMeaning (existential)PsychologyHumanitiesSocial psychologySocial scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study has as its object the daily lives of pioneer students (1953 to 1957) of University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing (EERP-USP).Historical perspective study with use of oral history and documentary analysis method.This methodology was used because of the need to build sources about the beginnings of EERP-USP.The community (individuals) in this study consisted of all students who lived in EERP-USP, between 1953 and 1957.The colony ex-students from the pioneer students, consisting of ten (10) women, two deceased.We must also consider the existence of two networks, because of the not mandatory boarding school model adopted by EERP-USP: 1st.network -students who lived in the faculty, 2nd.network -students who not lived in the EERP-USP.Were performed 7 interviews, which five (5) were analyzed according to the set of techniques for content analysis of Bardin (2005).Were examined 286 units of analysis, among these, 130 were excluded because of not meaning the daily life of the pioneer students, according to the theoretical approach.The documentary corpus analyzed was composed of 156 units of analysis listed in six (6) categories: Organization of privacy; Organization of work; leisure; prejudice; Rest and exchange.It is observed that the introduction of the image of the registered nurse in Ribeirão Preto, through EERP-USP faced obstacles because of prejudices of the local community regarding the image of the nurse.Marketing strategies such as lectures, radio, flyers were put into practice in order to promote the image of registered nurse.The nurse training in EERP-USP, not only through education, but the whole process of behavioral framing of the students, contributed to the dissemination of the profession.To achieve these goals, it was observed that the daily lives of students was surrounded of hierarchical surveillance strategies and normalizing rules allowing assimilation of a "model behavior ", exemplary, with traces of Canadian influence in teaching and behavior.On the other hand, scientific, cultural and behavioral training, promoting the formation of elite students, with possibility of reaching leadership positions in the scientific field of national and international nursing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth, Nursing, Elderly CareFrench-language works237,207