MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552219035

Acoustic enhancement of proposed grand lecture hall using computer simulation

2011· article· en· W1552219035 on OpenAlex
Chris DiMarino, Dillon Fuerth, Devin Gignac, Adam Lunardi, Colin Novak, Robert Pikul, Anthony Simone

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverberationCLARITYSoftwareComputer scienceEngineeringAcousticsSimulation softwareIdeal (ethics)Lecture hallSimulationElectrical engineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presented research deals with the acoustical performance of a proposed grand lecture hall using experi mental and modeling techniques.The primary challenge for the senior undergraduate engineering group was that the room has yet to be fully designed or constructed.The secondary goal was to optimize the design of the room using the computer software ODEON in the early design stage rather than after it has been built as is often the case.Reverberation time, early decay time, clarity and STI were the four acoustical parameters considered.The modeling software was also validated using test measurements conducted in a similar lec ture room.The results of the present room design demonstrated less than ideal reverberation time and early decay times for the proposed room use but above average clarity and STI values.Design suggestions are given to increase the acoustical performance of the proposed lecture hall. r s u m La recherche prsente est une tude des conceptions pour optimiser les proprits acoustiques d 'un amphi thtre par mthodes exprimentales et avec les modles informatiques.Le principal dfi pour le groupe d 'tudiantes de quatrime anne en gnie tait que la salle n 'a pas t encore compltement conue ou con struit.L'objectif secondaire tait l 'optimisation de l'amphithtre en utilisant le logiciel ODEON au stade de la conception, plutt qu'aprs que la salle a t construit, comme c 'est souvent le cas.Les quatre paramtres du son en considration taient: le temps de rverbration, le temps de dcroissance, la clart et le STI.Plu sieurs exprimentes ont t men dans un amphithtre similaire pour corroborer le modle en ODEON.Les rsultats du prsent amphithtre conceptuel ont dmontr des niveaux de temps de rverbration et temps de dcroissance moins que ceux qui seraient idales pour ce type de salle de classe, mais ils ont aussi indiqu des valeurs de la clart et de STI au dessus de la moyenne.Les suggestions sont donnes pour augmenter la performance acoustique des paramtres sous-performants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it