Les images modifiées du corps : nouvelles formes d’identité : Avec une note sur les cadavres de l’anatomiste Gunter Von Hagens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses the ideological nexus between radical aesthetic and cultural practices featuring the mutilation or symbolic transformation of the body and the evolution of the techno-medical ethos in this era of increasingly powerful electronic techniques. The author argues that the latter enable the medical penetration of the interior of the body at a distance, rendering obsolete the traditional medical interaction with an embodied person. The author links these changes in medical practice to trends in the contemporary art world involving spectacular and transgressive manipulations of the body by the artist—the prime example given is that of Orlan, the doyenne of live theatricalized plastic surgery as a kind of performance art. The author’s more elaborated example is the sensationally popular and long-running touring exhibit of plastinated bodies by the anatomist Gunther von Hagens. The article highlights contradictions in the response of the French legal system (and the Catholic Church) to these fascinating and disturbing cultural developments. The author suggests that we have moved into a trans-human era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it