MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552536859 · doi:10.7454/jki.v2i8.99

Gambaran Pelaksanaan sistem komunikasi RS-Puskesmas-Keluarga pada Bayi Resiko Tinggi

2014· article· id· W1552536859 on OpenAlexaff
Yeni Rustina, Wiwin Wiarsih, Elfi Syahreni

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Keperawatan Indonesia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sistem komunikasi merupakn suatu sistem sarana yang menunjang kesinambungan asuhan keperawatan bayi risiko tinggi di komunitas setelah bayi pulang dari rumah sakit. Perawatan di rumah merupakan tanggung jawa keluarga dan dipantau oleh perawat puskesmas melalui kunjungan rumah. Perawatan lanjutan dapat dilaksanakan secara optimal apabila terjalin komunikasi yang baik antara RS-Puskesmas-Keluarga. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif yang bermaksud untuk mengevaluasi sistem komunikasi RS-Puskesmas-Keluarga dan keluarga yang ada saat ini dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Sampel terdiri dari 3 kelompok yaitu ibu-ibu dengan bayi risiko tinggi berjumlah 61 orang, perawat RS dan perawat Puskesmas yang merawat bayi risiko tinggi masing-masing berjumlah 66 orang dan 15 orang. Lokasi penelitian dilakukan di RSUPN Ciptomangunkusumo, RS Persahabatan, dan 6 puskesmas kecamatan di wilayah Jakarta Timur (Duren Sawit, Kramat Jati, makasar, Pasar Rebo, Cipayung, Cakung).Hasil yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa sistem komunikasi RS-Puskesmas-Keluarga yang ada saat ini kurang begitu baik. Hal ini digambarkan oleh rendahnya kunjungan rumah perawat Puskesmas (6,56%), sementara itu ibu-ibu bayi risiko tinggi (83,61%) menyatakan perlunya kunjungan rumah perawat Puskesmas. Kurangnya kesadaran ibu-ibu bayi risiko tinggi akan pentingnya surat rujukan terlihat melalui survey ini, karena hanya 26,67% perawat Puskesmas yang menerima surat rujukan. Materi penyuluhan yang didapat ibu-ibu bayi risiko tinggi dari perawat (RS dan Puskesmas) kurang memenuhi kebutuhan karena hanya mencakup perawatan umumdan pencegahan penyakit, serta sistem rujukan, tidak mencakup pertumbuhan dan perkembangan anak. One of the important facilities in the community health care services for the high risk babies is improvement of the communication system. Home visit and care have to be done and it’s the responsibility of the Community Health Nurses and families. Home care It can be effective if there is a good communication system between Hospital, Community Health Centre and the families. This study is a descriptive research design which has a purpose to evaluate the communication system in Indonesian’s Health care institution and the families.The sample consist of three group, namely mothers with high risk babies, nurses in the hospital and community health service in East Jakarta.The result shown in this study is that most of the mother’s of high risk perceived that there is lack home careservice and they received lack of information (health education materials).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Keperawatan IndonesiaSame topicHealthcare Quality and SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207