MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552555175

"The List of the Nation’s Heroes": Voluntary Enlistment in Chatham, Ontario 1914-1916

2015· article· en· W1552555175 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Matt Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian military history · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppealPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines patterns of recruiting and enlistment during the most intense period of mobilisation in a small regional centre of 12,000 in the heart of rural southwestern Ontario. It studies the effects of recruiting efforts within a specific, but typically Canadian, local culture, isolating targeted men within the catchment area and then considering who joined and who did not. It argues that recruiters struggled to appeal to Canadian-born citizens, and resorted to increasingly coercive methods when pure voluntarism could not fill the ranks. In early 1915, the city of Chatham, Ontario was in the midst of a nineteen day campaign to find 200 men to join the Canadian Expeditionary Force (cef) overseas. One Tuesday late that month, Achille Pattiyn emerged from the imposing red brick armoury in Tecumseh Park, a newly enlisted member of the 33rd Battalion. Pattiyn was one of three men who passed the medical examination that day, but his trip to the recruiters’ office started three days earlier with a fistfight. Pattiyn was a Belgian citizen living and working in Chatham. At a hotel the previous Saturday, a local took exception to the presence of a Belgian in Chatham while men from the city were fighting in defence of his country. “It is understood,” reported the Chatham Daily Planet, “that he was accused by a certain Chathamite of lacking sufficient nerve to fly to the defence of his country. Pattiyn claimed that business interests held him here, but that he wanted to reach the front. Arguments waxed warm with the inevitable result.” © Canadian Military History 24, no. 1 (Winter/Spring 2015): 141-180 1 : The List of the Nation’s Heroes Voluntary Enlistment in Chatham, Ontario 1914-1916 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2015 142 : The List of the Nation’s Heroes A fight broke out, and “the Chathamite was worsted in the fistic encounter.”1 Far from lamenting the local man’s defeat, the Daily Planet relished Pattiyn’s commitment to doing his bit in the Great War underway in Europe. As soon as he paid his fine in police court, the feisty Belgian went straight to the recruiter’s office and joined up. The controversy over how Canada filled the ranks of its overseas forces during the First World War raged long after hostilities ended in 1918. In conjunction with the c ef ’s achievements on the battlefield, recruiting and the conscription crisis have come to characterise Canada’s Great War. From 1917 to war’s end, the conscription crisis cast a long shadow over voluntary enlistment. Discussion has centred on the failure of the voluntary system and the controversies that followed, examined through the prism of Anglo-French relations. For decades afterwards historical inquiry into recruiting served largely to demonstrate why voluntary recruiting failed gradually in English Canada and entirely in French Canada.2 More recent studies have examined recruiting in Ontario as a local and cultural phenomenon largely removed from the national experience. In that province, recruiters’ organisation and propaganda were “extensions of the social, intellectual, and cultural norms of prewar society,” and governed by the “recruiting establishment,” informal groups consisting of prominent members of the professional middle class and their associated organisations.3 These men were aided by civilian recruiting agencies, municipal and provincial governments, 1 “Recruits Being Accepted at the Armoury,” Chatham Daily Planet, 27 January 1915. 2 See, for example, Desmond Morton, Canada and War: A Military and Political History (Toronto: Butterworth and Co., 1981); Desmond Morton, A Military History of Canada (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Inc., 1992); Jack Granatstein and J.M. Hitsman, Broken Promises: A History of Conscription in Canada (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1977). Other investigations blamed the decentralised system adopted by Ottawa or cast the ‘failure’ of voluntary recruiting as the perception of a particular set of Canadians. See Robert Craig Brown and Ramsay Cook, Canada 1896-1921: A Nation Transformed (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart Limited, 1974); Matthew R. Bray, “ ‘Fighting as an Ally’: The English-Canadian Patriotic Response to the Great War,” Canadian Historical Review 61, no. 2 (June 1980). 3 See Ian Hugh MacLean Miller, Our Glory and Our Grief: Torontonians and the Great War (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002); Paul Maroney, “The Great Adventure: The Context and Ideology of Recruiting in Ontario, 1914-17,” Canadian Historical Review 77, no.1 (March 1996); this article based upon his MA thesis, Paul J. Maroney, “Recruiting the Canadian Expeditionary Force in Ontario,” MA Thesis, Queen’s University, 1991. 2 Canadian Military History, Vol. 24 [2015], Iss. 1, Art. 27 http://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol24/iss1/27

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian military historySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207