MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552598600 · doi:10.1063/1.1401556

Workshop report: Science with the XFEL

2001· article· en· W1552598600 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Sutton

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)Instrumentation (computer programming)Set (abstract data type)PhysicsComputer scienceOpticsEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report summarizes the discussions help by Group II of the ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop called Future Light Sources, Physics of, and Science with, the X-ray Free-Electron Laser. It starts with a discussion of several experiments which will benefit from the high intensity and the short pulses of the proposed XFEL beams. The choice of these experiments reflects the interests of the participants and the proposed sets of first experiments to be done with the XFEL. The second section discusses some of the instrumentation and optics issues that arise because of these experiments. The final section lists a set of topics that need active research and development in order to fully utilize these sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207