MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552600005 · doi:10.1159/000158098

Isolation and Characterization of Plasma Membrane from Rat Mesenteric Arteries

2008· article· en· W1552600005 on OpenAlexaff
Jiann-Wu Wei, Ronald A. Janis, Edwin E. Daniel

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Vessels · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumMembraneBiochemistryVesicleChemistryATPaseMicrosomeGolgi apparatusBiophysicsBiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for isolating a plasma membrane-enriched fraction and other subcellular fractions from rat mesenteric arteries by the use of a discontinuous sucrose density gradient is decribed. Electron microscopy showed both plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum fractions to be composed of vesicles. 5'-Nucleotidase, alkaline phosphatase, ouabain-sensitive (Na+ + K+)-ATPase and K+-phosphatase, and phosphodiesterase I were concentrated in the plasma membrane fraction. The increase in ATP-dependent calcium uptake in the presence of oxalate was greater in the endoplasmic reticulum than in the plasma membrane fraction. The lack of inhibition of active calcium uptake by azide suggests that the plasma membrane-enriched fraction was relatively free of mitochondrial contamination. Calcium uptake by the plasma membrane or the endoplasmic reticulum fraction was not enhanced by high-energy compounds other than ATP, and was little affected by 100 mM KCl or NaCl in the Mg++-containing medium. Subcellular fractions isolated by this method will be useful for investigating the biochemistry of small blood vessels of the rat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood VesselsSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207