Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shoreface-attached ridges present along the south side of Sable Island, Nova Scotia, are the largest and deepest yet described, but become smaller and finer grained to the east because of decreasing energy levels. Strong, along-shore, storm currents cause them to migrate eastward at rates that may reach 50 ma'. Their migrating troughs erode underlying sediments, modifying the wave-ravinement surface and creating shoreline-oblique depressions up to 12m deep. Deposition occurs on their lee side, in the form of gently dipping, graded storm beds up to 1.2 m thick containing both high-angle cross bedding and hummocky cross-stratification. Overall, the ridge deposits coarsen upward and resemble shoreface successions. Obliquely onshore, cross-ridge flow causes upbuilding by the Huthnance process and accounts for the unusually high angle (~ 50°) between the ridges and the shoreface. Resume Les cretes situees dans la zone infratidale du littoral, au sud de l'ile Sable Island en Nouvelle-Ecosse sont les plus grosses et les plus profondes decrites a ce jour, bien que leurs volumes et la granulometrie de leurs constituants diminuent vers l'est, a cause de la diminution des niveaux d'energie ambiants. De forts courants cotiers engendres par des tempetes provoquent leur migration vers l'est a des vitesses pouvant atteindre 50 metres par annee. Leurs cuvettes d'affouillement mobiles erodent les sediments sous-jacents, modifient les surfaces d'erosion crees par les vagues et creusent des depressions, obliques par rapport a la ligne du littoral, dont la profondeur atteint 12 m de profondeur par endroits. Les sediments se deposent sur la face aval sous la forme de couches sedimentaires de tempete, granoclassees et faiblement pentues, mesurant jusqu'a 1,2 m d'epaisseur et montrant des stratifications entrecroisees normales ainsi que des stratifications entrecroisees a surfaces bosselees (HCS dans l'article). Globalement, la granulometrie des sediments de ces cretes s'accroit vers le haut, ressemblant en cela aux empilements littoraux. Lexistence d'un courant cotier oblique vers le rivage, et en travers des cretes, provoque l'accumulation de sediments en vertu du mecanisme de Huthnance et explique le grand angle (~ 50 degres) que font les cretes par rapport a la ligne de rivage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.992 | 0.993 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".