MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552664769 · doi:10.1177/1536867x1201200206

Threshold Regression for Time-to-Event Analysis: The Stthreg Package

2012· article· en· W1552664769 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
KeywordsRegression analysisProportional hazards modelComputer scienceEvent (particle physics)RegressionR packagePath (computing)StatisticsData miningMathematicsMachine learningProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we introduce the stthreg package of Stata commands to fit the threshold regression model, which is based on the first hitting time of a boundary by the sample path of a Wiener diffusion process and is well suited to applications involving time-to-event and survival data. The threshold regression model serves as an important alternative to the Cox proportional hazards model. The four commands that comprise this package for the threshold regression model are the model-fitting command stthreg, the postestimation command trhr for hazard-ratio calculation, the postestimation command trpredict for prediction, and the model diagnostics command sttrkm. These commands can also be used to implement an extended threshold regression model that accommodates applications where a cure rate exists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it