Bibliographic record
Abstract
Baseball scholars and historians have long accepted that Abner Doubleday did not invent in Cooperstown, New York in 1839.1 Doubleday's legend survives, however, as part of folklore; Americans would likely deride the suggestion that a foreign country created baseball. Yet, Canadians recorded a baseball game played in 1838 in Beachville, Ontario.2 Does the Canadian record debunk the Doubleday legend? The answer, in all likelihood, is no. The modern-day game of most resembles the form of developed in New York in the early nineteenth century.3 Canadian baseball, however, developed on a parallel and often intertwined path with that of its counterpart, and played an instrumental role in shaping as we know it today. How did this quintessential American game flourish in the land of the frozen north? An even more important question for Canadian fans is: Will the professional game survive in Canada? This Article will briefly describe the growth of in Canada and discuss some of the issues facing professional as it struggles to remain a viable industry in Canada in the global era of the game.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".