MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552839485

A novel self collapsed corrugated MEMS phase shifter

2013· article· en· W1552839485 on OpenAlexaff
Maher Bakri-Kassem, Raafat R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microwave Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase shift moduleCapacitive sensingInsertion lossMaterials scienceMicroelectromechanical systemsCoplanar waveguideReturn lossTransmission lineOptoelectronicsCapacitorPhase (matter)Electrical engineeringElectric power transmissionVoltageElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsMicrowave
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel CPW based phase shifter that relies on automatic collapse of capacitive switches is designed, fabricated and tested. The novel design of the phase shifter is due to a novel CPW topology and automatic collapse mechanical design that is designed to operate at several and gradual collapse voltages. The novelty of the CPW has been achieved through the corrugated grounds to create a slow wave transmission line. The resulted compact CPW will have an effective electrical length that is physically equivalent to a relatively longer conventional CPW. The automatic collapse of the designed capacitive switches comes through deferent lengths of the beams that are carrying those capacitive switches. The worst measured insertion loss and return loss are 1.7 dB and 13 dB, respectively, at 30 GHz with a phase shift of almost 106 degrees. The phase shifter is built on alumina substrate of gold material using UWMEMS process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Microwave ConferenceSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207