Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis discuss about renewable energy development in addressing the problems of energy security and environmental security in Canada. Canada as one country who care about energy security and environmental security, trying to resolve the problems that caused by conventional energy. Conventional energy inflict problems to environmental that make gas carbon emission which is then pushed global warming and air pollution. Inability of conventional energy which can not be renewable realize Canada to guarantee their energy supply in the future. This problems pushed Canada to be formed policy about renewable energy development and then encourage the establishment of Ecoenergy program. Ecoenergy program have a mission to resolve environmental problems and to guarantee Canada’s energy supply by developing and using renewable energy. Ecoenergy have six sub – programs, Ecoenergy for Renewable Power, Ecoenergy Innovation Initiative, Ecoenergy Technology Initiative, Ecoenergy for Renewable Heat, Ecoenergy for Biofuels and Ecoenergy Biofuels Capital Initiative. Canada also make Ecoenergy as basis in joint international cooperation to developing renewable energy at Asian – Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate Change Program and U.S – Canada Clean Energy Dialogue Program. Through all of this, Ecoenergy is a program that can make Canada resolve energy security and environmental security problems at the same time
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".