MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553096597 · doi:10.1186/s13660-015-0717-1

Complete convergence and complete moment convergence for weighted sums of m-NA random variables

2015· article· en· W1553096597 on OpenAlexaff
Yongfeng Wu, Tien-Chung Hu, Andrei Volodin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inequalities and Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Anhui ProvinceTongling UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsConvergence (economics)Moment (physics)Proofs of convergence of random variablesRandom variableConvergence of random variablesApplied mathematicsCombinatoricsStatisticsSum of normally distributed random variables

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors study the complete convergence and the complete moment convergence for weighted sums of m -negatively associated ( m -NA) random variables and obtain some new results. These results extend and improve the corresponding theorems of Sung (Stat. Pap. 52:447-454, 2011). In addition, we point out that an open problem presented in Sung (Stat. Pap. 54:773-781, 2013) can be solved by means of the method used in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inequalities and ApplicationsSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207