Migrations fictionnelles de l’observateur: le regard extérieur sur le Canada et ses médiations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pays d’immigration, le Canada est riche en textes littéraires – tant anglophones que francophones – écrits par des immigrants. Récemment, la critique littéraire intéressée à la représentation de l’altérité culturelle a développé le paradigme de la “littérature migrante”. Or, il existe un stratagème très ancien pour jeter un coup d’œil étrange et étranger sur ma propre culture; il consiste à inventer un observateur extérieur qui se déplace. Appliqué dans Les lettres persanes de Montesquieu de manière paradigmatique, ce stratagème connaît une modalité particulière quand le regard extérieur est narrativement construit par le déplacement d’un personnage qui, loin d’être étranger, vient de la culture propre – canadienne en l’occurrence – et se déplace pour jeter un regard extérieur sur sa propre culture. De ce fait, ce regard interne devenu externe acquiert un potentiel critique. On analyse ici ce stratagème, afin de faire ressortir sa valeur critique, dans deux romans – The englishman’s boy, de Vanderhaeghe, et The navigator of New York, de Johnston – et dans le film Nô, de Robert Lepage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".