MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553308383 · doi:10.20380/gi2001.09

The Rayset and Its Applications

2001· article· en· W1553308383 on OpenAlexaff
Minglun Gong, Yee‐Hong Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRendering (computer graphics)Computer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceParallaxComputer graphics (images)Image-based modeling and renderingObject (grammar)Sequence (biology)AnimationRepresentation (politics)Virtual imageReal-time rendering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel concept, rayset, is proposed. A new image based representation, object centered concentric mosaics (OCCM), is derived based on this concept. The rayset is a parametric function, which consists of two mapping relations. The first mapping relation maps from a parameter space to the ray space. The second one maps from the parameter space to the attribute space. We show that different image-based scene representations can all be cast as different kinds of raysets, and image-based rendering approaches can be regarded as attempts to sample and reconstruct the scene using different raysets. A collection of OCCM is a 3-D rayset, which can be used to represent an object. The storage size for OCCM is about the same as an animation sequence generated with a virtual camera rotated around the object. However, comparing with such an animation sequence, OCCM provide a much richer experience because the user can move back and forth freely in the scene and observe the changes in parallax.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207