MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553334381 · doi:10.4000/rhei.905

La gestion de la déviance des filles à Montréal au XIXe siècle. Les institutions du Bon-Pasteur d’Angers (1869-1912)

2003· article· fr· W1553334381 on OpenAlexaffabout
Véronique Strimelle

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d’histoire de l’enfance « irrégulière » · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours du XIXe siècle, nombre de pays occidentaux mirent en vigueur des politiques spécifiques destinées aux enfants délinquants et en danger. Au Québec, cette transformation des politiques pénales se concrétisa en 1869 avec la création d’un double réseau d’institutions distinctes pour filles et garçons délinquants et en danger: les écoles de réforme et les écoles d’industrie. Ce sont les institutions montréalaises pour filles créées à la suite de cette loi et gérées par la communauté du Bon-Pasteur d’Angers qui font l’objet du présent article. Nous nous y intéressons plus spécialement aux valeurs et méthodes éducatives développées par les religieuses du Bon-Pasteur dans le cadre de leur travail auprès des filles. Cette analyse permettant en finale de comparer les modes d’enfermement des filles et des garçons et de s’interroger sur la place laissée aux filles dans les politiques d’intervention pénale mises en oeuvre au Québec à la fin du XIXe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d’histoire de l’enfance « irrégulière »Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207