MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553419031

Optimizing folded dipole array with quick smith chart manipulations giving broadband absorption surface and optional two-way communication

2013· article· en· W1553419031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microwave Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandComputer scienceResistive touchscreenBandwidth (computing)Dipole antennaChartRadarElectronic engineeringSmith chartElectrical impedanceDipoleOpticsAcousticsElectrical engineeringAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsEngineeringImpedance matchingPhysicsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radar absorbing surfaces with excellent 100% bandwidth have been made possible lately with square loops of resistive strip. However, a setup with such absorbing surface may still need an extra antenna to maintain outside communication and this could be cumbersome. If such broadband absorbing surface is made of an array of actual antennas, and one or a few of them can be tapped for outside communication when needed, then the extra antenna is not needed. This paper shows that indeed an array of folded-dipoles, forming square loops, can be designed for such purpose and bandwidth through optimization. The optimization is actually quite simple, by manual manipulations of the impedance locus in Smith chart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it