MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553592219 · doi:10.1111/geb.12202

A systematic review and conceptual framework for the mechanistic pathways of nurse plants

2014· review· en· W1553592219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Biogeography · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaYork UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of the Interior
KeywordsEcologyCategorizationLandscape ecologyMechanism (biology)Conceptual frameworkPsychologyBiologySociologyComputer scienceHabitatEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim To conceptualize the mechanistic pathways of the nurse‐plant syndrome by life‐form and to identify the implications of positive plant–plant interactions for landscape and evolutionary ecology. Location Global. Methods We conducted a quantitative review examining 298 articles to categorize the literature on nurse‐plant interactions based on geographic region, mechanism of facilitation, ecological hypothesis and nurse life‐form. Results A total of nine different nurse mechanisms were identified and two were classified as meta‐mechanisms. We found that shrubs were the dominant nurse life‐form (46% of total studies) and that studies of positive plant interactions were most frequent in areas of high abiotic stress. Nurse‐plant studies were also distributed unevenly around the globe with nearly a quarter in the S outh A merican A ndes and S pain. Studies testing the direct nurse–protégé interactions were the most frequently performed, including the ecophysiological responses of protégé species (32.2%). Research gaps identified in the nurse‐plant literature included indirect interactions and seed trapping as well as the large‐scale implications for landscape ecology and evolution. Main conclusions Nurse plants are often considered keystone species because they commonly structure plant communities. This is an important confirmatory finding in many respects, but it is also novel in that it challenges traditional plant ecology theory and has important implications for landscape‐level dynamics over time. The categorization of mechanisms proposed provides a conceptual framework useful for organizing the research to date and can accelerate linkages with theory and application by identifying important connections. It is becoming increasingly apparent that future studies of the nurse‐plant syndrome must decouple and consider multiple mechanisms of interaction to explain the processes that influence community structure, particularly in high‐stress conditions, given a changing climate and potential shifts in biodiversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it