MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553599480 · doi:10.1002/9780470027318.a0111

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, High Resolution Ex Vivo

2000· other· en· W1553599480 on OpenAlexaff
Ian C. P. Smith, Dorothea E. Blandford

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear magnetic resonanceSpectroscopyNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyEx vivoMagnetic resonance imagingResolution (logic)In vivoMagnetic fieldResonance (particle physics)High resolutionChemistryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsIn vitroComputer scienceAtomic physicsBiologyChromatographyMedicineRadiologyBiochemistryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, or magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), is a powerful physical technique to determine the quantity and structure of chemical compounds in a specimen. It involves the interaction of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic radiation with a collection of nuclei immersed in a strong magnetic field. It is unique in its ability to provide nondestructive chemical analyses in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, no or very little pretreatment of the specimen is required prior to making a measurement. Spectra take only a few minutes to acquire, and it is not necessary to preselect the metabolites of interest in order to detect and quantify them. Its limitations are a lack of availability of instruments and large databases of spectral changes correlated with pathological conditions, and a detection sensitivity of approximately 1 µM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Analytical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207