MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553626940

WTO 협정상 환경보호를 위한 무역규제의 성립요건에 관한 분석

2006· article· ko· W1553626940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이춘삼

Bibliographic record

Venue무역학회지 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionInternational tradeBalance (ability)Free tradePolitical scienceInternational economicsEconomicsBusinessLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to research the problems of trade restriction for an environment protection. Environmental regulation relate to trade are Montreal Protocol, Basel Convention, the Convention on climate change, the Convention on Biological Diversity. The result of this study are the main issues of trade connected with environment is concentrated in the range and methodology of trade restriction is being in conflict with WTO rules. In domestic environment problem, the parties also shall accept the trade conditions which propose to resolve environment problem so far. we should concern the problems: ⅰ)Article 20 in GATT, ⅱ) Eco-labeling and PPMs, ⅲ) Unilateral trade restriction, ⅳ)Analyzing the effects of a liberalizing of trade and environments. For in the balance rules of trade and environment, First, must satisfy WTO's basic principles and principle of quantitative restrictions prohibition. Second, must satisfy GATT article 20 (b) clause and (g) protestation each essential factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue무역학회지Same topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207