Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’exploration du rêve correspond à un point cardinal de la cosmologie surréaliste. André Breton l’intègre tant dans sa compréhension philosophique du rapport de l’homme au réel, que dans l’élaboration de sa poétique. L’un et l’autre réceptacle, qui profitent de la ressource onirique, sont englobés dans la notion totalisante de « hasard objectif ». Je me propose ici d’étudier comment le rêve – qu’il soit perçu comme défi herméneutique ou comme source artistique – s’inscrit dans cette notion. Je me référerai surtout aux Vases communicants, un texte majeur de Breton par rapport à la thématique du rêve. L’approfondissement de celle-ci, chez le père du surréalisme, appelle un discours hybride. Je montrerai que les différents registres convoqués sont en eux-mêmes signifiants en regard du sujet traité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".