MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W155410030

Predicting rehabilitation potential with the K -nearest neighbors algorithm: a comparison with the current clinical assessment protocol

2006· article· en· W155410030 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mu Zhu, Wenhong Chen, John P. Hirdes, Paul Stolee

Bibliographic record

Venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
Keywordsk-nearest neighbors algorithmProtocol (science)Computer scienceRehabilitationData miningMachine learningCurrent (fluid)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceHealth careMedicinePhysical therapyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data from eight Community Care Access Centres (CCACs) in Ontario, we demonstrate that an automatic, data-driven, machine learning algorithm such as the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm can predict rehabilitation potential more effectively than the current Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP). Implications for clinical decision-making and computerized health information systems are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulationSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207