MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554191543 · doi:10.1029/2003rs002932

Observations of double‐peaked <i>E</i> region coherent spectra with the CUTLASS Finland HF radar

2004· article· en· W1554191543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectral lineDepth soundingRadarElectrojetAzimuthGeologyPhysicsSporadic E propagationSpectral densityComputational physicsAstrophysicsIonosphereGeodesyGeophysicsOpticsAstronomyTelecommunicationsEarth's magnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperative UK Twin Located Auroral Sounding System Finland HF radar observations of E region coherent spectra are presented for several events. The Burg spectrum method is applied to study microstructure of the spectra. It is discovered that many spectra are two‐peaked, and quite often there is a systematic pattern in their occurrence; the double‐peak echoes are typically observed at intermediate and far ranges of the E region echo band and at ranges farther than the power maximum in the range profile. The typical separation between the peaks is about 150 m/s and hardly changes with the azimuth of observations. Velocities of two components in a double‐peak spectrum are typically larger and smaller than the velocity of the unresolved spectrum and single‐peaked velocity of echoes at shorter ranges. It is hypothesized that the two components of the echoes occur because of signal reception from the top and bottom of the electrojet layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it