Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Malgré ses omissions et les difficultés d’interprétation qu’il peut engendrer, le recensement canadien de 1681 constitue une source de premier ordre pour l’étude de la population dans la vallée du Saint-Laurent au xvii e siècle. Dans cet article, nous utilisons cette source pour mieux cerner la structure de la domesticité rurale mais aussi son ampleur. Bien que faiblement représentée au sein de la population rurale, la domesticité que l’on retrouve dans les campagnes canadiennes de la fin du xvii e siècle apparaît en 1681 assez diversifiée. Composée d’hommes et de femmes, tant adultes qu’enfants, cette main-d’œuvre travaille aussi bien pour les habitants que pour les seigneurs et quelques notables. Plus que la taille ou la composition des familles, ce sont les écarts économiques observés entre les ménages à travers la taille de leurs exploitations respectives et celle de leur cheptel qui la justifient. On a donc affaire, dès la seconde moitié du xvii e siècle, à une société paysanne canadienne déjà bien hiérarchisée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".