MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554239228 · doi:10.1002/0470027320.s0205

Incandescent Sources for Mid‐ and Far‐Infrared Spectrometry

2001· other· en· W1554239228 on OpenAlexaff
Henry Buijs

Bibliographic record

VenueHandbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsABB (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncandescent light bulbInfraredSpectroscopyInfrared spectroscopyFar infraredMass spectrometrySynchrotronNear-infrared spectroscopyThermal infrared spectroscopyMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsChemistryPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The sections in this article are Background Étendue Power Emitted by an Ideal Incandescent Source APractical Mid‐ and Far‐Infrared Source Other Mid‐ and Far‐Infrared Sources Very‐Far‐Infrared Spectroscopy High Resolution Infrared Spectroscopy IR Spectroscopy with a Synchrotron Source Terahertz Spectroscopy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0870.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHandbook of Vibrational SpectroscopySame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207