MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554253560

Attitudinal Impacts on Employment of Persons with Disabilities

2015· article· en· W1554253560 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura Yvonne Bulk

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth professional student journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Education and Employment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingPovertyPsychologyOccupational therapyPublic relationsNursingPolitical scienceMedicineEconomic growthPsychiatryEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poverty and under-employment are major issues faced by Canadians with disabilities. This brief literature review, written by a Master of Occupational Therapy student, will explore the impact of dominant culture and social attitudes on the employment of persons with disabilities. The attitudes encountered by individuals with disabilities are a major contributor to either impeding or allowing success. Attitudes will be discussed as either inclusive, facilitating employment, or ableist, limiting employment. As healthcare professionals, it is part of our responsibility to ensure all members of our society can participate and thrive. Therefore, we must be aware of our own attitudes and how they either facilitate or hinder the participation of persons with disabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth professional student journalSame topicDisability Education and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207