MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554466193 · doi:10.1002/adem.201500097

Some Physical Characteristics of Strain Hardening in Severe Plastic Deformation

2015· article· en· W1554466193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Materials · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMicrostructure and mechanical properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMaterials scienceSimple shearvon Mises yield criterionStrain hardening exponentPlasticityWork hardeningHardening (computing)Shear (geology)Stress pathMechanicsMicrostructureComposite materialThermodynamicsFinite element methodPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown here using group theory principles that the Hencky strain is not an appropriate measure for tests involving simple shear, for which the von Mises formulation should be used exclusively. It is also shown analytically that the application of self‐similarity principles to Stages III–IV indicates that these obey power laws, while the same principles do not apply to the other stages. As a result, they do not develop self‐similar microstructures. Finally, the effect of strain path on the work hardening rates themselves is also examined. It is shown that the lowest rates are again associated with simple shear because this is the path along which the number of intersecting slip systems is the lowest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it