Experiences with Individual Cell Equalizers ability to prevent, diagnose, and correct common battery conditions, 1988-1995
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper identifies beliefs and misconceptions relating to the operation and testing of stationary battery banks, and the problems they present to the battery user. These problems cost millions due to the inability to prevent, diagnose; and/or correct common battery conditions. This paper also identifies how BWB Battery Corp. Ltd. has used the Individual Cell Equalizer (ICE), designed and patented by Ericsson Communications Inc., Stockholm, Sweden to prevent and correct these problems. The first installation of ICE by BWB was in 1988. Since then, we have had the opportunity to identify and study the advantages of this unique device. It has been used as a tool for maintenance, testing, and the prevention of known inherent battery conditions. ICE has provided substantial savings in all aspects of maintenance and testing. Using modern maintenance techniques that have been developed by BWB to complement the use of ICE, it is now possible to identify defective cells, measure operational life and security of battery banks at a fraction of the traditional cost. Techniques are presented to show evidence that the voltage levels of all cells will now be uniform with little or no voltage variations. Techniques are presented to show evidence that if cells are consuming a normal amount of current with ICE to maintain their set voltage level, they will be found to be within their rated capabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".